Affidavit improvement ammendment
20260406-5 \\ ??? words \\ Rejected \\ No summary
Currently the way are system is using affidavits are kind of useless, I propose a bill that gives it more of a usefulness and gives it more of a concrete form
\########################
IMPORTANT:
I talked to camel a bit ago about this, he gave two reasons against two and three.
For two it was originally that a witness could only be asked about evidence referenced in their affidavit, I have since changed it but still in a way to encourage it being used in the affidavits
For three, I have not changed it, instead I added four and five which aims to prevent camels problem of ommiting evidence, another solution to that, is requesting unsequestered witnesses, which means they can be asked questions about others testimony in court.
Another thing camel said was that it was too complicated, and yes, I can see why he might think that, ultimately it leads to more fair trials.
Please feel free to ask questions or request/suggest changes
And council, im sorry for the long ass read
Metadata
Internal ID: 301
API access: /301.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775493793
Proposer: Equivalent_Elk2413
Original link: AFFIDAVIT IMPROVEMENT AMMENDMENT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: Floyd B. Olson Fan
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-06 21:29:10