dihydrogen monoxide act/amendemnt/whatever it is

20260409-3 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ No summary

so like we always say a bill was “vetoed” when the president didn’t veto it so it get confusing right. so to fix this I propose:
the dihydrogen monoxide amendment
proposed by u/Kooky_Marketing_327 of the FUCK party on 04.09.26

on transparency posts and the post flairs for props/amendments voted down by council, they must now use the term “rejected” rather than “vetoed”
this only applies to things voted down by council. if president vetoes it may be listed as vetoed
bill happen effect inmediatory

ol thats it open to change by council i rushed this pls enjoy

Metadata

Internal ID: 317
API access: /317.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775775756
Proposer: Kooky_Marketing_327
Original link: DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE ACTAMENDEMNTWHATEVER IT IS
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: Zeedith
Recorded by tracker: 2026-04-09 23:08:49