Anti-Bias Law

20260410-0 \\ ??? words \\ Rejected \\ No summary

PROPOSED BY MINECRAFTGUY7401 (and reform committee)

Article I: Any citizen can file a bias complaint to court in response to any officials decision (ex. Council votes, presidential vetoes/passes, vice presidential votes, etc.), which, if the compaint passes through court, would stop that action from happening. (so if the president vetoes a law but a compaint goes through that law would be unvetoed)
Article II: Bias is defined as making a decision to benifit one’s, (including, but not limited to), company, party, coalition, or position, or to hinder one’s opposing (including, but not limited to), company, party, coalition, or position.
Article III: This can be avoided by providing a reason that isn’t something along the lines of “it would benifit me, so sure” or “it would hurt them, so sure” or similar versions.
Article IV: If enough bias complaints against an invividual occur, (example, 5 in a term, though this can be changed later, and is not part of this bill.) Court must notify council, and a vote to impeach occurs, using standard votes needed.
Article V: If a bias complaint is against a justice, then the complaint will occur as normal, but the vote will not include the accused justice.
Article VI: The court can also rule against bias if they believe it is a reasonable decision, (ex. pay raises for council members if council members are underpayed) but CANNOT rule bias if they believe it is an unreasonable decision made without bias.
Article VII: All passed bias compaints will be publicly accessible, and the one to record it will be either the Comdemtion Minister if the Comdemtion Record Act is passed, or the court if the Comdemtion Record Act fails and/or hasn’t been decided by council yet at the time.

# PROPOSED BY MINECRAFTGUY7401 (and reform committee) Article I: Any citizen can file a bias complaint to court in response to any officials decision (ex. Council votes, presidential vetoes/passes, vice presidential votes, etc.), which, if the compaint passes through court, would stop that action from happening. (so if the president vetoes a law but a compaint goes through that law would be unvetoed) Article II: Bias is defined as making a decision to benifit one’s, (including, but not limited to), company, party, coalition, or position, or to hinder one’s opposing (including, but not limited to), company, party, coalition, or position. Article III: This can be avoided by providing a reason that isn’t something along the lines of “it would benifit me, so sure” or “it would hurt them, so sure” or similar versions. Article IV: If enough bias complaints against an invividual occur, (example, 5 in a term, though this can be changed later, and is not part of this bill.) Court must notify council, and a vote to impeach occurs, using standard votes needed. Article V: If a bias complaint is against a justice, then the complaint will occur as normal, but the vote will not include the accused justice. Article VI: The court can also rule against bias if they believe it is a reasonable decision, (ex. pay raises for council members if council members are underpayed) but CANNOT rule bias if they believe it is an unreasonable decision made without bias. Article VII: All passed bias compaints will be publicly accessible, and the one to record it will be either the Comdemtion Minister if the Comdemtion Record Act is passed, or the court if the Comdemtion Record Act fails and/or hasn’t been decided by council yet at the time.

Metadata

Internal ID: 318
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1775787394
Proposer: 3p145
Original link: https://www.reddit.com/r/TeenGovernment/comments/1sh9okd/antibias_law
Approval admin:
Approval link: TAG
ARPD-Curator: Floyd B. Olson Fan

History

• 4/16/2026, 9:17:17 PM: Updated bill

Frequency

Comments

View existing comments on this post.