Parole Omnibus Act

20260626-1 \\ ??? words \\ Passed \\ No summary

Pre-Parole Act (Written by Camel and Krasnaya)
Definitions:

Inmate: Anyone sentenced to the prison server for a sentence over 1 week

Preliminary Parole Request (PPR:) A form filled out by the inmate applying for the Pre-Parole Program

Preliminary Hearing: Public VC or text chat with two lawyers and a judge. One lawyer, appointed to be the “prosecution” will conduct a “cross-examination” of the applicant and another, appointed to be the defence, will conduct a “direct-examination” of the applicant.

Case Manager: A justice that sets the terms and length of the program and hears Pre-Parole Terms Violation Motions.

Article 1: All inmates shall have the right to this program
Article 2: The Pre-Parole program will be initiated by the inmate, using a Preliminary Parole Request (PPR)
Article 3: The PPR will look like this:
Question 1: What, if applicable, users or accounts would you like to have considered for parole?
Question 2: Out of the justices, which would you like assigned as case manager? (NOT IN LAW: THE QUESTION SHOULD HAVE ALL JUSTICES CURRENTLY SERVING IN IT IN A MULTIPLE CHOICE FORMAT)
Question 3: Do you promise to comply with all TG laws and rules?
Article 4: Once the inmate files a PPR, the justice they choose will do a Preliminary Hearing. When considering whether or not they shall be considered for the Pre-Parole Program, the justice may consider the following factors:

Has the inmate in question demonstrated good behavior before their PPR?

Has the inmate in question engaged in good faith discussions with the rest of the community?

Has the inmate in question violated TG Laws or rules?

Has the inmate in question engaged in ban evasion?

Would letting the inmate in question into the Parole Program be a just action considering their efforts?

Why was the inmate in question rejected from entry into the program? (If applicable)

Article 5: After the Preliminary Hearing, the justice will make a decision. Grant them entry into the Program, or not. They must write a minimum 100 word opinion explaining their decision.
Article 6: If the justice rejects the request for entry into the Preliminary Parole Program, the inmate in question may apply for another Preliminary Parole Request (PPR) with another justice.
Article 7: Should the justice accept the PPR, they may set a length of time in which the inmate in question must conform to certain rules the justice sets in order to prove they can enter parole.
Article 8: The justice may set the length of the program and may define other parameters for the program as long as they are legal. These parameters must be public.
Article 9: In the program, if the justice designated as Case Manager senses a violation of TG rules/ laws or Pre-Parole Terms, they can choose to terminate the program.
Article 10: Any person can file a Pre-Parole Terms Violation if they believe the terms of their Pre-Parole Program have been violated by the inmate in question.
Article 11: This Pre-Parole Terms Violation must be heard by the case manager
Article 12: If the ombudsman believes the terms set by the case manager are unfair, they may request council veto them with a majority vote.
Parole Overhaul Act (Fully written by Camel)
Article 1: If a person completes their Pre-Parole-Program, they will be assigned a Parole Officer. This officer may be a (in this hierarchy of preference)

Justice

Ombudsman

Council Member

Minister

Article 2: The Parole Officer may assign Community Service as according to the
Article 3: The Parole Officer may set the length of the program and may define other parameters for the program as long as they are legal. These parameters must be public.
Article 9: In the program, if the person designated as Parole Officer senses a violation of TG rules/ laws or Parole terms, they can choose to terminate the program.
Article 10: Any person can file a Parole Terms Violation if they believe the terms of their Parole Program have been violated by the person in question.
Article 11: This Parole Terms Violation must be heard by the Parole Officer
Article 12: If the ombudsman believes the terms set by the Parole Officer are unfair, they may request council veto them with a majority vote.

Metadata

Internal ID: 635
Type: legislation/constitutional-amendment
API access: /635.json
Bill proposed(Unix Epoch): 1782510476
Proposer: --Carmel--
Original link: PAROLE OMNIBUS ACT
Approval link: N/A
ARPD-Curator: John Rock Brown
Recorded by tracker: 2026-06-27 13:08:21

History